 |
Buy this VHS video movie at online store in your country
Canada
VHS Movie Reviews of PunisherMovie Review: Not Bad Summary: 4 StarsNot bad considering that Marvel Comics Company did not lend a hand with this film. They did the best with what they had. I think Dolph Lundgren did a great Job portaying the Punisher and in my opinion he should have played the Punisher in the new Punisher Movie instead of Thomas Jane, don't get me wrong Thomas did a good job playing the role of the Punisher, he just did not look enough like the Punisher, Dolph resmbles the punisher a great deal and played the role almost to perfection. But this version of the punisher does have it's faults like for example Dolph's version of the Punisher does not display the Trade Mark Skull on his shirt, and the movie took place in australia instead of New York. But overall the Movie was pretty good considering the lack of help from Marvel. Louis Gossett Jr. also played a good part in this movie, The new Punisher is a little more accurate than this version, but this movie is still a must get and see.
Movie Review: punisher Summary: 3 Starsthis dudes family gets wasted in front of him so he goes on a murderous rampage vs organized crime.the punisher is played by the russian dude from rocky 4.this ones more than the kids can handle.especialy the kidnapping parts.his enemy?the jap mob!the real deal is they could have done better but they didnt do bad!
Movie Review: Good but should have spent more time with Dolph Summary: 4 StarsThey should have spent more time with the Punisher, but instead they focus too much on the two groups of bad guys in the movie, the Yakuza and the other mafia type gang. Dolph looks great in this movie, and a good feel starts to develop in the movie with him brooding, riding around stoically on his motorcycle clad in black leather and delivering some very unique to the Punisher, and also the best action movie quotes ever! 'Why are the innocent dead and the guilty alive','I punish the guilty' outstanding stuff! It would have been great to have more of that. The Punisher is way too cool and idea for them to just cut to the other, by comparison uninteresting characters. Exactly who decided to put those scenes with Dolph praying nude in the sewer? It would have been better with him in his cool black leather outfit like he wears in the rest of the movie. It would have been better with him clothed. The main characters of the Japanese gang are two women. They have too many women in this movie; the Punisher is more of a guy oriented comic book character. We even have to watch a scene where the blond woman walks around in some ridiculous thong outfit while the other Japanese lady plays the piano. They also spend too much time developing the tough image of both gangs, when they could have been focusing on Dolph's character and shown more of the all out gun/explosive battles-that's more what the Punisher is all about. We don't want to watch endless scenes with gang members swearing at each other. The also spend too much time with the two reporters. The action in the movie is extreme and the gun battles good, which makes you wish that would have been more the focus of the movie. Some of the violence is not for the squeamish, which could have been toned down in one of two spots, (the crossbow scene) but still good.
Movie Review: If society won't punish the guilty, he will. Summary: 3 StarsLet's face it, before Blade (1998), X-Men (2000) and Spider-Man (2002), Marvel Comics really didn't have much luck in getting successful films made based on their characters. The reason? Because they would often sell the movie rights to anyone who had two coins to rub together, releasing cinematic flops like Dr. Strange (1978), Howard the Duck (1986), Captain America (1989), and even a Fantastic Four movie that was so bad it never saw the light of day, as it was too bad to even release on video. And then there was The Punisher (1989), a character introduced in the 70's within the pages of The Amazing Spider-Man, issue 129, circa February 1974, a former police detective, now vigilante, taking revenge on criminals, motivated by the death of his family. Most people I know who've seen the film have pretty distinctive feelings about it, ranging from dislike to severe hate, but I always thought it was pretty good, considering...The film, directed by Mark Goldblatt, whose primary credits include editing films like The Howling (1981), The Terminator (1984), and True Lies (1994), stars Dolph Lundgren, Louis Gossett, Jr., and Jerome Krabbé. Yeah, I know what you're thinking...Dolph Lundgren? I think a number of people had instant reservations when hearing Dolph, certainly an interminable dweller of the B movie circuit, pre-judging the film unfairly. Lou Gossett, Jr. brings a little star power to the table, but he also is no stranger to B movie fans appearing in films like Jaws 3-D (1983), Firewalker (1986), and any of the four or so Iron Eagle films. The film opens with a television news report, giving us some expository background with regards to a mafia type recently acquitted of the crime of killing detective Frank Castle (Lungren) and his family five years prior. The report also speaks of an elusive character named the Punisher, who has been busy killing members of the mafia over the last five years, racking up an impressive body count. Any connection? Probably...anyway, the mafia guy, returns home to celebrate, and guess who crashes the party? Killing and explosions ensue. Enter Detective Jake Berkowitz (Gossett). Seems Detective Berkowitz has been leading the investigation of the Punisher for the last five years, and believes the Punisher is actually Frank Castle, despite his superior's beliefs that Castle is dead, as the thought of a rogue cop going around killing people would be unpopular. With the recent death of this mafia boss, there's a void of real leadership in the organization, one filled with the return of Gianni Franco (Krabbé) from Europe, who intends to unite the remains of the various mob families whose ranks have been severely depleted by you know who... Turns out the decimation of the mafia families hasn't gone unnoticed, as the Yakuza (Japanese mafia) has decided to move in and take a controlling interest in criminal activities within the city, a hostile takeover, to say the least. Sounds pretty to the Punisher, as if the criminals are killing themselves off, less work for him...until the Yakuza kidnaps children of the remaining mafia families in an effort to extort control and pressure them under the Yakuza's thumb. So Castle, feeling somewhat responsible as his five-year vendetta has left the families unable to protect even their own children, begins dealing with the Yakuza, which eventually leads to an unlikely alliance with Franco, who's son is one of the kidnapped children. Guns, knives, throwing stars, explosions, it's all here (well, as far as the explosions, at one point the Punisher is firing a grenade launcher, and the explosions seem less than spectacular, more flashy than boom boomy). Not only that but there's a good amount of karate. Lundgren, a former karate champion himself, performs most all of his own stunts, and there is almost no choreography within the marital arts scenes, as real artists were used, and training in stunt techniques. Does the film stay true to the original character portrayed in the comics? For the most part...some minor changes, along with a few major ones (he never dons a shirt emblazoned with a white skull on it). I think one of the main reasons this film was ill received is because comic fans are a particular picky lot, as they spend a lot of time getting to know these characters, and tend to have high expectations when someone adapts one of their favorite characters to the silver screen. I read comics from the age of 9 until I was 23, so I have intimate knowledge, or at least I did, of many characters, and I thought this particular rendition of this character retained most of the important elements. The main element I didn't care for was his living in the sewers. I brought to mind teenage mutant ninja turtles, which is an altogether different film. I did think Lundgren face makeup was overdone. I understand why it was done the way it was, to present the visage of a skull when the light hit his face just right, and it succeeded, but other times he sort of looked like a drag queen. The most painful element of the film was the dialog. I rolled my eyes more than a few times as the delineation between Frank Castle and the Punisher was examined, unsuccessfully. Some of it was extremely corny, more so combined with Lundgren's deadpan delivery. The direction was pretty good in most areas, given that this was Goldblatt's second film, his first being the Joe Piscopo/Treat Williams cop flick Dead Heat (1988). Goldblatt has since returned to editing, which seems a much better fit for him. Gossett is fun to watch, but again, given the dialog, he is given some completely rotten lines, but he does seem to try to make the best of it, earning whatever he got for appearing in this film. A nice wide screen anamorphic print here and good audio, with special features including production notes and a theatrical trailer. Cookieman108
Movie Review: As good as the new one. Summary: 4 StarsThe action in this movie is the best. The effects this movie uses for being from 1989 are awesome. And take this tip from someone who cares. DO NOT BUY A USED VIDEO FROM TSA VIDEO IF YOU VALUE YOUR MONEY.
More Movie Reviews: First Review 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
|
 |