 |
Buy this VHS video movie at online store in your country
Canada
VHS Movie Reviews of PhiladelphiaMovie Review: it's not about the acting... Summary: 5 StarsTwo of my best friends were living their last days when Philadelphia was made. One of them went to the Dr. whose office was used in the opening scenes, and was receiving an experimental drug that was the precursor to today's more successful cocktails. I watched them struggle at a time when Reagan wouldn't even say the word AIDS to the public. Bush wasn't much better. So to have a film come out that tried its best to tackle the most tragic disease in our lifetime, one that touched me personally, well, I was and am willing to forgive a couple of shortcomings. It was a monumental film for anyone struggling with AIDS, and for those who helped support them, giving us all one of the first voices that permeated the psyche of our country, beyond the boundaries of NY and SF.
Now I just learned a good 14 years after the fact, that one of those best friends, Tim Pettifer, was among the guys in the waiting room in "One Foot On A Banana Peel and the Other In the Grave" which is included here. In his characteristic modesty, he never mentioned that it might be produced, and it was released after he died. I'm going to buy it of course, and am filled with nervous anticipation (and dread) at the thought of seeing him come back to "life". I've never stopped grieving this loss.
My point is that the work and effort that went into this film went far beyond Hollywood and acting and such. It spoke a truth that was, at that time, not being talked about intelligently, if at all. As one of Tim's caregivers, I know for a fact that there was so much in Philadelphia that was spot on. The film bears witness to an excrutiating moment in time, when most of our nation was in total denial. Sadly, not much has changed.
Movie Review: As Powerful As Ever Summary: 5 StarsI purchase a lot of DVDs. For the past few years, it seems that almost every DVD comes in a special edition two-disc release that includes deleted scenes, documentaries, cast bios, trailers, teaser trailers, music videos, and the director's recipe for three-alarm chili. I usually don't have time to get beyond the first disc, and much of what I do get around to usually turns out to be as boring as it gets. This time, however, I am happy to report that the two-disc anniversary release of Philadelphia is worth both the money and the time invested in it, even if you already have Philadelphia on DVD.
The special features include the 84-minute documentary, One Foot On A Banana Peel and the Other In the Grave, an extraordinary piece of amateur filmmaking by an AIDS patient named Juan Botas. What I did not know was that Mr. Botas' AIDS diagnosis provided the inspiration for director Jonathan Demme to make Philadelphia in the first place, as Mr. Botas was best friends with Mr. Demme's wife. In the meanwhile, Mr. Botas mentioned to filmmaker Demme that it was a shame that the black humor, amazing courage and other interesting dialogue that emanated from his fellow patients at the clinic where he was being treated was being lost forever as it left their lips. Mr. Demme gave Mr. Botas his hand-held camera, and the results so impressed Demme that he wound up releasing the documentary through his own production company. The finished film is touching, oddly comic, tragic and as effecting as any piece of drama you've ever witnessed. One of the patients from the doctor's office was also given a few lines in the main feature, Philadelphia.
Which brings us to that film. At the time of its release, Philadelphia received some very harsh criticism from the AIDS community for its perceived flaws; it was judged by many as "too Hollywood" to be realistically representative of the HIV / AIDS experience. To their credit, in the background documentary included here, "People Like Us" (which was the original working title of Philadelphia) the creative team behind Philadelphia (including Jonathan Demme, Tom Hanks and the screenwriter Ron Nyswaner) meet this criticism head on, presenting a defense of their work that is both credible and illuminating. Many complained that Philadelphia was void of any tenderness or physical contact between the male couple (Hanks and Bandaras) but this is not only redressed by a closer look at their scenes together, an extremely intimate scene between the lovers in bed (which was excised from the final cut) was deleted not for its controversy but because the scene simply didn't work (having now seen it, I can attest to this fact). I have long seen this movie as not a film about AIDS per se, but as a film about homophobia. Indeed, the main thrust of the plot (besides the trial) is the transformation of the character of Joe Miller from committed homophobe to a more enlightened and tolerant person. One of my favorite scenes (which it turns out many people wanted to delete from the final cut) deals subtly with Millers transformation - the "opera scene".
In that scene, Miller is asked by the character or Andy what he thinks about gay people. The attorney responds that, when straight people think of them at all, most straight people pretty much see all gay people as some sort of sub-human predatory monsters, out to ensnare the children of the world into a twisted sick life, and destroy all that straight people hold dear. Andy abruptly changes the subject, "Do you like opera, Joe?" he asks. Caught by surprise, Joe admits he does not know anything about it - and Andy Beckett - this sub-human destroyer of children, responds by tenderly and passionately explaining his deep love for beautiful music by allowing Joe to see just a small piece of exactly why so many gay men love opera. He plays the aria La Mama Morte, carefully, passionately and articulately explaining the story and the beauty behind the words and music. Joe is immediately transformed - it's clear that he is deeply moved. By playing the piece, La Mama Morte through again in its entirety, the screenwriter and director shows us that the music has stayed with Joe long after he's left Andy's home. We see him leave Andy's apartment and go home in a sort of daze, kiss his sleeping baby and slip into bed with his slumbering wife, while the beauty of the music haunts and caresses him, like a gorgeous gay lullaby. Some of my gay friends were among those who didn't get this scene - they saw it only as a stereotypical depiction of a gay man's love for opera. I got it right away - by exposing Joe to a thing of beauty he'd never experienced before, Andy had suddenly allowed Joe to consider that gay men were not only something more than what he thought, he demonstrated that we are capable of enormous passion and the ability to appreciate delicate beauty. This scene, more than any other, allowed Andrew Beckett to be transformed from a predatory sub-human freak into a human being, not only for Joe Miller, but for many in the straight audience. It has remained one of my favorite scenes in a movie ever, and a small part of what makes Philadelphia such a powerful experience.
Highly recommended.
Movie Review: no title Summary: 5 StarsAnother movie with sniffling and Kleenex. Tom Hanks, as I foresaw in "Big", is absolutely superb. Another comic, like Robin Williams and Bill Murray, with marvelous depths. And yet the movie is not really about a man with AIDS, as all the critics say it should be, and then berate it because it isn't; it's about society's reaction to gays and AIDS, a much broader subject. On that scale, it delivers well. We don't need detail scenes of Tom Hanks and his lover, or his facing the disease, or any other of the nitty-gritty the critics said was lacking. I think they missed the point entirely. Washington was society, and his slow progression from homophobia to understanding is what Demme is trying to say to the audience. And, increasingly, I am thinking, we should be out there, living life, helping people, instead of watching them on a two-dimensional screen. Maybe movies really distance us from life, instead of imparting more knowledge.
Movie Review: No, No, No Summary: 3 StarsFirstly, this is NOT an AIDS film. It's not a gay film. It is first and foremost a courtroom drama. That it uses AIDS as it's raison d'etre is irrelevant. If you replaced AIDS with anything from sexual discrimination, to race or religion it would be pretty much the same film. I don't think Tom Hanks and Antonio Banderas actually touch in the film-even when they're lying in bed together. But it still is interesting for what it is.
Movie Review: A crude statement! Summary: 5 StarsAIDS is simple word that encloses so many meanings, destinies and opposite points of view. A prestigious lawyer of a very distinguished bureau will be forced to renounce due this disease.
This fact will be the point of no return not only for him, but besides a red alarm for all those who think in major or minor level they are far beyond the danger 's line and absolutely immunized against this terrible lash.
A bold film, that depicts crudely all the stages of this fatal victim, as well as his professional, social and affective circle, the legal efforts and finally a cry in the darkness of the intransigence and disregard around many human beings.
A solid script, carefully built keeping in mind the delicate dealt issues. Tom Hanks dressed his showiest gifts and making the highest performance of his lifetime. He won the Silver Bear in Berlin and the Academy Award for this role.
More Movie Reviews: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
|
 |